Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: Dean Riddlebarger <dean@truevision.com>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: More ANI Fun!
Message-ID: <10504@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 6 Aug 90 14:24:00 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: Dean Riddlebarger <epicb!dean@uunet.uu.net>
Organization: Truevision Inc., Indianapolis, IN
Lines: 19
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 545, Message 9 of 15


I tried the number through two routes at the office.  Normal 9+
dialing from my System 25, where our ARS is set to throw 800 calls out
to the CO trunks, yielded our main BTN.  No surprise there.  On the
off chance that IBT was allowing unique CO line identifiers to get out
via the ANI interface, I also tried a bypass technique on the 25 to
grab a CO trunk directly.  No dice -- the local IBT switch apparently
passes the main BTN for any call from our CO trunks.

I wonder if this company is working a comarketing deal with MCI?
Their equipment is obviously getting ANI input from a variety of
carriers, but their recorded pitch specifically refers to MCI.


Dean Riddlebarger                   
MIS Manager - Truevision, Inc.      
[317] 841-0332                      
uucp: uunet!epicb!dean   dean@truevision.com