Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!crdgw1!sunbelt!eaker
From: eaker@sunbelt.crd.ge.com (Charles E Eaker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: DOER..MAKE
Message-ID: <10929@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Date: 10 Aug 90 18:33:09 GMT
References: <9008101346.AA02615@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Organization: General Electric Corporate R&D Center
Lines: 12

In article <9008101346.AA02615@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> wmb%MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM@SCFVM.GSFC.NASA.GOV writes:
>I think it is possible to "have your cake and eat it too" in this case.
>I have no problem with adding "syntactic sugar" *on top of* a regular
>postfix foundation.

Hmmm. Then, what, if anything, is wrong with DOER...MAKE when viewed
as syntactic sugar?


--
Chuck Eaker / P.O. Box 8, K-1 3C12 / Schenectady, NY 12301 USA
eaker@sungod.crd.ge.com    eaker@crdgw1.UUCP    (518) 387-5964