Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!daver!tscs!tct!chip From: chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Who pays the bill? Message-ID: <26BEC4A1.1783@tct.uucp> Date: 7 Aug 90 13:39:44 GMT References: <65517@sgi.sgi.com> Organization: ComDev/TCT, Sarasota, FL Lines: 20 According to lear@turbo.bio.net (Eliot): >You might also argue that the service is incompetant, but such a >statement requires backing. I would argue that my rabid rerouter is >far more compentant than the users who send mail through me. No rerouter can be more competent than I am at deciding which sites I wish to *avoid*. For example: I avoid apple because they mung headers. Starting today I avoid texbell, because it's going away. I avoid rutgers and Eliot's site because they reroute rabidly. [*] Rabid rerouters defeat all my careful attempts at black hole avoidance. In this respect they are EVIL and RUDE. [*] Don't argue that because I try to avoid RR sites, the RR issue doesn't concern me. I'll never know where all of them are. -- Chip Salzenberg at ComDev/TCT ,