Xref: utzoo comp.periphs.scsi:895 comp.unix.ultrix:4216 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!coherent!dplatt From: dplatt@coherent.com (Dave Platt) Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.unix.ultrix Subject: Re: Which disk to buy? Message-ID: <66708@coherent.coherent.com> Date: 10 Aug 90 16:46:31 GMT References: <26C0DD8D.22566@orion.oac.uci.edu> <1990Aug9.144555.18566@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> Reply-To: dplatt@coherent.com (Dave Platt) Followup-To: comp.periphs.scsi Organization: Coherent Thought Inc., Palo Alto CA Lines: 25 In article <1990Aug9.144555.18566@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> abstine@image.soe.clarkson.edu (Arthur Stine) writes: > If you are looking for some fast disks in the 300MB range, look into the > CDC (now Seagate) Wren-Runners. They have a faster seek time (since they spin > faster than 3600 rpm) and their transfer rates are also higher I believe. > The other Wren's are good too, just not quite as speedy as the WrenRunner. According to a conversation I had with an Imprimis/CDC/Seagate rep at Systems/USA earlier this year, Wren Runner drives spin at the same speed as normal Wrens. A 300-meg Wren Runner is built using the same mechanism as a 600-meg Wren... but the Runner firmware is set up to use only the outer half of the disk. A 600-meg Wren (or a 300-meg Wren Runner) has its cylinders packed roughly twice as closely as a normal 300-meg Wren. Hence, when a 300-meg Wren Runner must move its heads to a new cylinder, it must move them (on average) only about half as far as a normal Wren would have to move. This cuts the seek-time by roughtly one third, on average (e.g. 10 msec typical rather than 16). It's true that Seagate/Imprimis is working on drives which spin faster than the usual 3600 RPM. This increases the drive's transfer rate... the speed with which it can read or write data _after_ the seek has been completed and the drive is on-sector. It doesn't directly affect seek speed by very much (except for latency within the track being sought).