Xref: utzoo alt.sources.amiga:100 comp.sys.amiga:63485 comp.sys.amiga.tech:13896 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!well!jax From: jax@well.sf.ca.us (Jack J. Woehr) Newsgroups: alt.sources.amiga,comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: replacing the 68000 by a 68070 - is it possible Keywords: 68070 68010 processor replacement Message-ID: <19508@well.sf.ca.us> Date: 12 Aug 90 03:58:16 GMT References: <453@krabat.marco.UUCP> Lines: 26 helmut@marco.UUCP (Helmut Raiger) writes: >Hi, >does anybody know wether the Amiga 500 runs with the 68000 replaced by >an 68070 (I know, that the 68070 does not have an synchronous bus interface - >E, VPA and VMA missing). Can the Amiga firmware support this chip? The short >exception format is like the one of the 68010, but the long one is different. Helmut ... It *might* be possible to develop a drop-in board for the 68070, (though why one would do it, i don't know). The 68070 from Philps/Signetics is *not* the 68040 + 30. It is a 68010 mask with added functionality (DMA, I^2C bus, MMU) for use as an embedded controller. While it offers a higher clock speed than the 68010, its cycle-efficiency is lower by apporimately one cycle per operation due to the MMU. My experience with this chip was in designing a single board computer for embedded control (never commerically produced). < Member, > /// ///\\\ \\\ /// < X3J14 TC > /// /// \\\ \\\/// < for ANS > \\\ /// ///====\\\ ///\\\ < Forth > \\\/// /// \\\ /// \\\