Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1 From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Disney Presents: The Animation Studio (Finally!) Message-ID: <1990Aug12.224327.29882@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 12 Aug 90 22:43:27 GMT References: <19442@well.sf.ca.us> <19463@well.sf.ca.us> <19511@well.sf.ca.us> Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News) Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Distribution: na Organization: Columbia University Lines: 31 In article <19511@well.sf.ca.us> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes: >In article ked01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Kim DeVaughn) writes: >>Since 2.0 isn't "finalized" (read: burned into rom), > > 1.0 wasn't "finalized" either. 1.1 came along and stabilized the >system, fixing copious bugs. 2.0, much as we'd like to claim the contrary, >has bugs and misfeatures. CBM is aware of many 2.0 problems, so they will >undoubtedly address those problems the same way they addressed 1.0 problems: >release a new version. As far as I'm conerned, if 2.0 WERE the official release, it would be 10x better than most other major O/S revisions! Take MS Windows 3.0, OS/2 or what everyone is expecting from System 7.0. It is definitely a usable system. Of course, I'd like to see the bugs disappear as much as anyone. I have no complaints (yet 8). >_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ >Leo L. Schwab -- The Guy in The Cape INET: well!ewhac@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU > \_ -_ Recumbent Bikes: UUCP: pacbell > !{well,unicom}!ewhac >O----^o The Only Way To Fly. hplabs / (pronounced "AE-wack") > "Because you never know who might want to sit in your lap." -- Ethan Ethan Solomita: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu "If Commodore had to market sushi they'd call it `raw cold fish'" -- The Bandito, inevitably stolen from someone else