Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!grebyn!ckp
From: ckp@grebyn.com (Checkpoint Technologies)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: MMU + A3000 + AmigaOS2.0 == Non-crashing system?
Message-ID: <21001@grebyn.com>
Date: 6 Aug 90 13:53:09 GMT
References: <2489@clinet.FI> <20889@grebyn.com> <6303@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Reply-To: ckp@grebyn.UUCP (Checkpoint Technologies)
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing, Vienna, VA, USA
Lines: 15

In article <20889@grebyn.com> ckp@grebyn.UUCP (Checkpoint Technologies) writes:
> Therefore, the way to get MMU protection for your applications is to
> abandon application binary compatibility; and if you're going to do
> this anyway, then why not just use Unix?

In article <6303@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Real-time response?

Valid point.  You could choose another appropriate real-time protected
kernel.  I hear Mach is nice; I wish I knew more about it.
-- 
First comes the logo: C H E C K P O I N T  T E C H N O L O G I E S      / /  
                                                                    \\ / /    
Then, the disclaimer:  All expressed opinions are, indeed, opinions. \  / o
Now for the witty part:    I'm pink, therefore, I'm spam!             \/