Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!merch!cpe!hal6000!trsvax!jory
From: jory@trsvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Hi-Res VGA boards & Monitors
Message-ID: <292200026@trsvax>
Date: 3 Aug 90 01:16:00 GMT
References: <9624@hawkmoon.MN.ORG>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:hawkmoon.MN.ORG:9624:trsvax:292200026:000:852
Nf-From: trsvax.UUCP!jory    Aug  2 19:16:00 1990


Let me correct my previous posting:

 >According to the documentation that came with my ATI VGA Wonder card (with
 >512K of memory), it can handle 1024X768 in either interlaced or non-
 >interlaced mode.  However, the documentation that came with my NEC 3D
 >states that it will do 1024X768 in non-interlaced mode only.  Thus, the
 >limiting factor is not the video card, but the monitor in my case.  Is it
 >because you only have 256K of memory which limits your video card to 
 >a non-interlaced signal at 1024X768 resolution?

I meant to say:
		   However, the documentation that came with my NEC 3D
 states that it will do 1024X768 in *interlaced* mode only.  Thus, the
 limiting facter is not the video card, but the monitor in my case.  Is it
 because only have 256K of memory which limits your video card to
 an *interlaced* signal at 1024X768?