Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!shelby!neon!pescadero.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: SE screen qulaity (was Re: Fixed Plus)
Message-ID: <1990Aug11.215303.23121@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 11 Aug 90 21:53:03 GMT
References: <2WSNKHF@cs.swarthmore.edu>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 16

In article <2WSNKHF@cs.swarthmore.edu>, fought@campus.swarthmore.edu writes:

> By the way, whenever I see an SE or SE/30 in action, one thing comes to 
> mind:  Why are SE screens so much worse than all of the Plus screens I've 
> seen?  In the best case, they are just a little blurry, and in the worst it 
> is impossible to read anything that has been reverse highlighted.  My 
> MacPlus is clear as a bell.  Has anyone else noticed this?  If I get an SE/
> 30 someday, would it be (theoretically) possible to hook up a Plus screen to 
> it?  They seem so much better.

I remember hearing somewhere that the screen was one of the few parts in
common between the Plus and SE. Maybe Apple isn't adjusting them as carefully
as they used to? I can't say I've been particularly aware of a difference...

Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu