Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!osprey.cvs.rochester.edu!carlo
From: carlo@osprey.cvs.rochester.edu (Carlo Tiana)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Disinfectant 2.0 vs SAM vs ?
Message-ID: <8918@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 11 Aug 90 17:46:12 GMT
References: <53318215MES@MSU> <90221.1412203XMQGAA@CMUVM.BITNET> <1990Aug9.221406.14913@midway.uchicago.edu> <8898@ur-cc.UUCP>
Sender: news@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
Reply-To: carlo@cvs.rochester.edu (Carlo Tiana)
Organization: Univ. Roch. Center for Visual Sci.
Lines: 16

In article <8898@ur-cc.UUCP> kellogg@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu.UUCP (Lars Kellogg-Stedman) writes:
>Personally, I consider Disinfectant itself THE best virus
>detection/disinfection program written.  To me, at least, it appears
> ...

Hear, hear!!!

> ...
>Doesn't John Norstrad have plans to implement search strings in
>Disinfectant, like SAM and Virus Detective?
>Lars

Yeah, and maybe disk scanning on insertion - then noone will have any
reason to use anything else any longer!

carlo@cvs.rochester.edu