Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!apple.com!chewy
From: chewy@apple.com (Paul Snively)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: The programming CULT (WOW!?)
Message-ID: <9698@goofy.Apple.COM>
Date: 10 Aug 90 22:09:28 GMT
Sender: usenet@Apple.COM
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
Lines: 23
References:<1990Aug9.040707.15339@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <9649@goofy.Apple.COM> <1203.26c2f334@waikato.ac.nz>

In article <1203.26c2f334@waikato.ac.nz> ccc_ldo@waikato.ac.nz (Lawrence 
D'Oliveiro, Waikato University) writes:
> In <9649@goofy.Apple.COM>, chewy@apple.com (Paul Snively) says
> "Semantically, there are no significant differences between Pascal and 
C".
> 
> Untrue. There are some important ones. It's true that the standard
> Mac Pascal dialect easily matches C in its ability to do low-level
> stuff. But Pascal also has some high-level features that have no C
> equivalent.

Semantic features or syntactic features?  And what are they?

__________________________________________________________________________
                                Paul Snively
                      Macintosh Developer Technical Support
                             Apple Computer, Inc.

chewy@apple.com

Just because I work for Apple Computer, Inc. doesn't mean that I believe 
what they believe, or vice-versa.
__________________________________________________________________________