Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!media-lab!mit-caf!npreyer From: npreyer@mit-caf.MIT.EDU (Norris Preyer) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: Re: TeXtures question Message-ID: <4928@mit-caf.MIT.EDU> Date: 10 Aug 90 11:55:39 GMT References: <0093AE22.A6D58A80@uclapp.physics.ucla.edu> <27878@netnews.upenn.edu> <0093AE45.4DA805A0@uclapp.physics.ucla.edu> <27892@netnews <8068@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> Reply-To: npreyer@mit-caf.UUCP (Norris Preyer) Organization: Microsystems Technology Laboratories, MIT Lines: 28 >In article <0093AE7D.ADDF3D20@uclapp.physics.ucla.edu>, jprice@uclapp.physics.u cla.edu (John Price) writes... >> I have run TeXtures on a Mac here at school, with a Deskwriter, and >>the output is indeed very good for a bitmap font. However, the Deskwriter >>is capable of much better. > >Actually, if all goes well, the best quality is given by bitmap >fonts. Because Textures goes through the standard Mac printer >driving software, I don't think it can take advantage of the full >benefits of the DVItype rounding algorithim (some subtle >interletter positioning is possible as anyone who has read and >understood DVItype... I'm still realizing the immense benefits >possible). All of this, however depends on a couple of things: [many interesting details omitted] > >Don Hosek TeX, LaTeX, and Metafont support, consulting Actually, TeXtures does have noticeable spacing problems printing to a Deskwriter (check out "book" and other double-o words) which vanish when it previews or prints to a laserwriter. OzTeX, combined with the excellent DVIM72-Mac quickdraw printing program, does not suffer this problem; quickdraw and postscript outputs are identical (and excellent). --Norris Preyer (npreyer@caf.mit.edu)