Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!pacbell!att!mcdchg!ddsw1!olsa99!oct1!mason From: mason@oct1.UUCP (David Mason) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: Word-processors for UNIX Message-ID: <1990Aug6.170248.3236@oct1.UUCP> Date: 6 Aug 90 17:02:48 GMT Reply-To: mason@oct1.UUCP (David Mason) Organization: Open Computer Technology Lines: 27 In article <13@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca> lyndon@cs.athabascau.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) writes: >In article <60@nososl.UUCP> erik%nososl@nac.no (Jan Erik Sevland) writes: >>Do anybody know about UNIX implementations of current (popular) >>PC wordprocessors like : >> Word Perfect > >We have Word Putrid running on our 3b2/1000's under SVR3.2. "Ugly" >doesn't even come close to describing it ... >-- > Lyndon Nerenberg VE6BBM / Computing Services / Athabasca University > {alberta,cbmvax,mips}!atha!lyndon || lyndon@cs.athabascau.ca I feel honour-bound to defend WordPerfect. I use WordPerfect all through my day to write a variety of documents for internal use as well as presentation use. It drives my LaserJet II perfectly, and produces excellent output without hassle. Many of our clients also use. And we all use it under Unix. I am really impressed with WordPerfect as a word processor and productivity aid. #include -------------------- David | mason@oct1 (David M Mason) | olsa99!oct1!mason@ddsw1.mcs.com