Xref: utzoo news.groups:22915 rec.pets:14995 rec.birds:2573 alt.aquaria:7361 rec.aquaria:1469
Path: utzoo!mnetor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!delphi!bob
From: bob@delphi.uchicago.edu (Robert S. Lewis, Jr.)
Newsgroups: news.groups,rec.pets,rec.birds,alt.aquaria,rec.aquaria
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: REC.PETS, REC.BIRDS division.
Message-ID: <1990Aug9.141910.3845@midway.uchicago.edu>
Date: 9 Aug 90 14:19:10 GMT
References: <1873@lectroid.sw.stratus.com> <26487@nigel.udel.EDU> <43573@apple.Apple.COM> <1918@lectroid.sw.stratus.com> <43759@apple.Apple.COM>
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (News Administrator)
Reply-To: bob@delphi.UUCP (Robert S. Lewis, Jr.)
Organization: University of Chicago
Lines: 19

In article <1918@lectroid.sw.stratus.com> mm@lectroid.sw.stratus.com (Mike 
Mahler) writes:
>
>         This article is the beginning of a discussion of:
> 
>         1)      What groups should be spawned from rec.pets;
> 
>         2)      What rec.birds should be renamed to since there
>                 will most likely be a rec.pets.birds.
>



Why not rec.birds.wild?  I don't think the sci.ornithology heading
suggested earlier would be a good one, since I don't think we want to
discourage amateur birders.


Rob Lewis