Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ora!ora!daemon From: llama@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Joe Francis) Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: Re: Child making and rearing ( Mild Soapbox ) Message-ID: <23575@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Date: 9 Aug 90 20:54:14 GMT References: <10848@cs.utexas.edu> <9584@goofy.Apple.COM> <352@ccrwest.UUCP> Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz) Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Lines: 31 Approved: ambar@ora.com In article <352@ccrwest.UUCP> ccrwest!desj@ucsd.edu (David desJardins) writes: [in a discussion of the merits of parental leave] > Thus, it is in society's *interest* to promote practices which lead >to future good citizens (I hope I'm not sounding too preachy here). >That is why we have public schools instead of providing education only >to those whose parents can afford it and choose to pay for it. And >similarly that is why we should be promoting opportunities for parents >to spend a reasonable amount of time with their children. I agree entirely. However, your example is not a strong analogy to mandated parental leave. Our education system is paid for by taxes. Only people and institutions who make money pay for our education system. Progressive taxation (I wish it was truly progressive - instead of giving breaks to the wealthy) is a very low-impact way to finance our education system. Mandated parental leave will cost businesses money. NOTE: Not PROFITABLE businesses, not LARGE CORPORATIONS, but all businesses. Many businesses barely survive. Making these businesses pay for parental leave is like making the very poor pay the tax rates of the very rich (all right, the rich get a break - make it the affluent and upper middle class, who actually pay the highest tax rates). Your analogy is better suited to publicly funded daycare, which I support and believe is both fairer in implementation and more beneficial then mandated parental leave. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Read My Lips: No Nude Texans!" - George Bush clearing up a misunderstanding