Xref: utzoo news.groups:23052 comp.arch:17720
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!shelby!eos!amelia!wilbur.nas.nasa.gov!eugene
From: eugene@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (Eugene N. Miya)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.arch
Subject: Re: comp.benchmark
Message-ID: <7858@amelia.nas.nasa.gov>
Date: 16 Aug 90 16:23:50 GMT
Sender: news@amelia.nas.nasa.gov
Reply-To: eugene@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (Eugene N. Miya)
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
Lines: 12

Dave Sill proposes a comp.benchmark.
This might be a good idea, but in my opinion, only if the group is moderated.
It would serve no other purpose than existing groups if not otherwise.
There is a performance mailing list and it's only use to date has been
to call for papers or announce TRs.  It should be more than a platform
for people to announce what they have.

Dave should be or find a willing moderator, but as a LAST resort, I'd do it.
Comments about iron handed moderation aside.... 8^)

--e. nobuo miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@orville.nas.nasa.gov
  {uunet,mailrus,other gateways}!ames!eugene