Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!dimacs.rutgers.edu!rutgers!ub!boulder!daemon
From: dfk@cwi.nl (Daniel Karrenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: PPP?
Message-ID: <24783@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 15 Aug 90 12:30:56 GMT
Sender: daemon@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Lines: 24





CISCO should suport PPP on the whole line
sync/async router/terminal server as soon as possible
and make clear statements on when what is expected to
become available.

Anything else will make customers unhappy and be counterproductive
for CISCO.

My priorities are

	sync  - router
	async - terminal server (for talking to TS users)
	sync  - terminal server (for attaching the server)

Since sync-router and sync-server are the same as far as implementation
is concerned this comes down to: do sync first, then async.

Daniel

PS: Of course customers ask everyting .... :-)