Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: munnari!cs.uow.edu.au!david@uunet.uu.net (David E A Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Fastest Pulse-Dialable Number?
Message-ID: <10873@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 14 Aug 90 23:28:06 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, Wollongong University
Lines: 8
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 570, Message 3 of 10


Wouldn't something with more zeros be longer? ie 900-999-0000 or if
they exist 900-990-0000 or 900-909-0000 or even 900-900-0000.


[Moderator's Note: If in fact such numbers are actually in service,
then yes, they would be slower. But we were trying to deal only with
actual, in-service numbers.   PAT]