Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: cgw@vaxb.acs.unt.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Slowest Dialable Number
Message-ID: <10947@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 15 Aug 90 13:14:29 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 25
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 574, Message 3 of 7


In article <10874@accuvax.nwu.edu>, barrey@ka (Barrey Jewall) writes:

> When I called 900-555-1212, I got to listen to a LONG (about 3 minute)
> recording of services available via 900 number. The recording was (of
> course) scratchy, and barely audible during some portions. The numbers
> listed seemed to be in no particular order, just sort of jumbled in.

That's odd, when I called, the recording was very clear and
understandable, although the woman speaking sounded like she was out
of breath more than once or twice. :-)

I didn't notice any sort of order either. 

> I doubt many people use the 900-555-1212 number to find their 900
> numbers.

I also doubt that. I've seen more ads for 900 services in the backs of
assorted magazines than were listed on the recording.


chris williams, `gilligan' | cgw@vaxb.acs.unt.edu      
programmer/operator        | UTSPAN::UTADNX::NTVAX::CGW
university of north texas  | CGW@UNTVAX {.bitnet}
denton, texas 76203        | at&t : +1 817 565-4161