Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wang!bu-tyng!three!cory From: cory@three.mv.com (Cory Kempf) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: THINK C and C++ Message-ID: <414@three.mv.com> Date: 13 Aug 90 04:20:53 GMT References: <23512@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1078@hpwala.wal.hp.com> Distribution: comp Organization: EnigamI, Nashua, NH. Lines: 24 keithb@hpward.hp.com writes: >Think C is NOT a full version of C++. It is C with objects, a subset >of C++. No new keywords were introduced, and things like new() and >delete() were implemented as functions. Further, there is no >. Hopefully, Symantec will implement a full version >of C++ in release 5.0. Probably not. I talked with some people from Think at MacWorld. The guy that I talked to seemed to imply that they were planning on adding C++-isms to TC, but were not planning on making TC into C++ -- maybe a seperate product someday if they could figure out how to do it right (his words, not mine). His main defense was that C++ is a moving target, and that they wanted to do it right [e.g. not CFront -- +C]. +C -- Cory Kempf I do speak for the company (sometimes). The EnigamI Co. 603 883 2474 email: cory@three.mv.com, harvard!zinn!three!cory -- Cory Kempf I do speak for the company (sometimes). The EnigamI Co. 603 883 2474 email: cory@three.mv.com, harvard!zinn!three!cory