Xref: utzoo comp.lang.misc:5367 comp.object:1609 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!carroll From: carroll@udel.edu (Mark Carroll ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.object Subject: Object-oriented computation model Message-ID: <27642@nigel.ee.udel.edu> Date: 16 Aug 90 17:01:57 GMT Sender: usenet@ee.udel.edu Reply-To: carroll@udel.edu (Mark C. Carroll ) Followup-To: comp.lang.misc Organization: University of Delaware Lines: 23 Nntp-Posting-Host: dewey.udel.edu As anyone who's ever bothered to read my posts knows, I'm interested in the kinds of machines that different languages model. In my last semester at Rutgers, I did some independent research (with Irv Rabinowitz) in Object-orientation. As a part of that, I attempted to find the "vonNeumann machine" of object-orientation. After much time spent thing, I believe that I have a suitable definition of the primitive object-oriented automaton. I'd like to get a couple of people to read it, and send my critiques. If it stands up to the abuse, and my advisor at Udel thinks its a good idea, I might end up publishing it. Anyway: If you're interested in seeing and critiqueing such a beast, please send me mail. -- |Mark Craig Carroll: |"We the people want it straight for a change; |Soon-to-be Grad Student at| cos we the people are getting tired of your games; |University of Delaware | If you insult us with cheap propaganda; |carroll@udel.edu | We'll elect a precedent to a state of mind" -Fish