Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!usc!rutgers!ub!oswego!news From: dab@Oswego.EDU (Dave Bozak) Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: NEW FOUNDATION ESTABLISHED TO ENCOURAGE COMPUTER-BASED COMMUNICATIONS POLICIES Message-ID: <1990Aug15.145039.11312@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Date: 15 Aug 90 14:50:39 GMT References: <5122@fernwood.mpk.ca.us> <1421@pta.oz.au> <1968@runxtsa.runx.oz.au> <64160@sgi.sgi.com> <1990Jul15.140533.17544@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <1990Aug15.144402.11208@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Reply-To: dab@oswego.Oswego.EDU (Dave Bozak) Organization: Instructional Computing Center, SUNY at Oswego, Oswego, NY Lines: 28 In Forester & Morrison's book, "Computer Ethics: Cautionary Tales and Ethical Dilemmas in Computing", there is the following: "In turn, Lotus itself was sued for $100 million by the Software Arts Procduts Corporation (SAPC), developers of the original VisiCalc program, who claimed that Lotus had copied many of the command and keystrokes as well as the screen displays of VisiCalc in 1-2-3. SAPC claimed that Lotus founder Mitch Kapor 'misappropriated' copyrighted and confidential aspects of the VisiCalc program while he was an employee of the exclusive marketing agent for VisiCalc. SAPC further alleged that later, as a product tester for an advanced version of VisiCalc, Kapor 'had access to copyrighted and confidential aspects' of the program. He 'deliberately sought to make the 1-2-3 program look and feel like VisiCalc'." The authors reference "The Australian", 21 April 1987 and "Business Week", 31 August 1987 and 22 May 1989. Does anyone know the status of this lawsuit? Is it still alive? Have they settled? Has it been thrown out? Given the Lotus win over Paperback Software, the result of this suit would be very interesting. /\ David Alan Bozak, Computer Science Department / \ SUNY College at Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126 (315) 341-2347 _____/____\_____ Internet: dab@rocky.oswego.edu / / \ \ or dab%rocky.oswego.edu@nisc.nyser.net /____/ \____\ UUCP: {cornell!devvax,rutgers!sunybcs}!oswego!rocky!dab