Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway From: JPALME@qz.qz.se (Jacob Palme QZ) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Subject: Re: Printable format (was: Re: ISO/CCITT meeting report) Message-ID: <406086*JPALME@QZ.qz.se> Date: 15 Aug 90 12:34:17 GMT Lines: 40 Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU In-Reply-To: <9008132356.AA16616(a)bel.isi.edu> X400-Received: by /PRMD=QZ/ADMD=TEDE/C=SE/; Relayed; 15 Aug 90 14:13:47+0200 > What? You want to have the email address on your business card have a > different syntax that is used in the user interface to send email? > > So every time you give your business card to someone you go through a > routine like this: "And across the bottom of my card is my email address, > but, of course, when you type it into the mail system you replace the > semi-colons with back-slashes, except for the third semi-colon which needs > two back-slashes, and, of course, if you are using unix where back-slashes > are special you type two of them whereever there is a semi-colon except > for the third semi-colon where you type four back-slashes. Is that clear?" > > This is obviously the way to go! > > --jon. I had the same opinion as you, until I saw the results of the human factors investigation. This investigation found the following results: User interface User interface single string form-fill-in +---------------------+---------------------+ Business card: ! Not reasonable ! Very good, but too ! Full labelled ! ! spacious on the ! format ! ! business card ! +---------------------+---------------------+ Business card: ! Bad results ! Very good ! Abbreviated ! ! ! labelled format! ! ! +---------------------+---------------------+ Business card: ! Not as bad, but not ! Not reasonable ! Concise format ! very good either ! ! +---------------------+---------------------+ So the human factors study did find that the best combination was to have a ***different*** format on the business card and in the user interface!!