Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!hplabs!hpl-opus!hpspdra!burdick
From: burdick@hpspdra.HP.COM (Matt Burdick)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: Re: RPC Technologies
Message-ID: <13710001@hpspdra.HP.COM>
Date: 16 Aug 90 00:31:28 GMT
References: <1990Aug13.231646.17415@athena.mit.edu>
Organization: HP Stanford Park - Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 12

> Mishkin thinks Asynchrony is hard to understand; it is not available
> in NCS.  Why not give the designer the choice?

This seems pretty lame: some people think that threads are easier or
cleaner to use - yet Netwise doesn't offer that ability.  Does this
mean that NetWise should "give the designer the choice" by offering
threads?

						-matt
-- 
Matt Burdick                |   Hewlett-Packard
burdick@hpspd.spd.hp.com    |   Intelligent Networks Operation