Xref: utzoo alt.security:1356 alt.folklore.computers:4681 comp.society.futures:1976 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: alt.security,alt.folklore.computers,comp.society.futures Subject: Re: Feedback on Computer Crime - Apology Message-ID: Date: 10 Aug 90 03:17:30 GMT References: <14462@wpi.wpi.edu> <9008091507.AA06792@stc06.CTD.ORNL.GOV> <14479@wpi.wpi.edu> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 5 Actually, the guy who did the first virus would probably qualify as a hacker. It was a cool hack as a new idea. Same with the guy who cam eup with the first copy protector, and the first guy to crack it. But there's no point in doing the same thing over and over again... -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U`