Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!news
From: xxrich@alliant1.lerc.nasa.gov (Rich Rinehart)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.alliant
Subject: Re: job classes
Message-ID: <1990Aug13.125921.24328@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>
Date: 13 Aug 90 12:59:21 GMT
References: <1990Aug10.112530.720@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland Ohio
Lines: 34

In article <1990Aug10.112530.720@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> xxrich@alliant1.lerc.nasa.gov (Rich Rinehart) writes:
>
>I'm running an intel hypercube simulator and am having trouble getting the
>forked processes it generates to run on individual ce's (they always
>want to run on the complex).  I've tried running the simulator using the
>'execute -ce` command, but any generated processes (it generates a process for
>every node of the hypercube that you simulate) still run on the complex. (?)
>
>Anyone have any ideas?  The scheduler is set: 
>
>setsched IP 11 -t  40  4  3 -t  20  3  4 
>setsched CL  0 -td 30  3  2  1 -t 30 3  2  1 
>setsched CE  0 -t  30  2  3 -t  30  3  2 
>setsched CE  1 -t  30  2  3 -t  30  3  2 
>(etc..)
>
>setcomplex CL 0 -d1 -c1
>

Thanks for all the email responses to my posting.  Patrick Wolfe suggested
using the -nc option on the link, which did the trick.  What I can't understand
though, is that I had specifed -Ogv on the link, thinking that it would notice
that I did not specify concurrency and NOT run me on the complex!!  Wouldn't
this make sense??  If i don't specify concurrency why default me to the complex?





--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Rinehart                  |     phone: 216-433-5211
NASA Lewis Research Center     |     email: xxrich@alliant1.lerc.nasa.gov
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------