Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: A3000 questions and comments
Message-ID: <1990Aug14.024145.9833@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 14 Aug 90 02:41:45 GMT
References: <4E470D12BFBF40044C@ISUVAX.BITNET> <13767@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1990Aug13.205558.17392@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <13780@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News)
Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 31

In article <13780@cbmvax.commodore.com> peter@cbmvax (Peter Cherna) writes:
>In article <1990Aug13.205558.17392@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) writes:
>
>>	No scalable outline? Compugraphic told me that Commodore
>>had licensed their font technology. This has been repeated to me
>>by someone of SoftLogic. Is this suddenly changed?
>
>Licensed != released in a product.
>

	But Licensed implies that a release is forthcoming. I
don't expect everything in 2.0. For a new release of a major
upgrade I am more than happy with 2.0 and its relative lack of
bugs, but I would be dismayed if Compugraphic isn't in place
within 6-8 months from now. It is coming to the Mac, and
Commodore I'm sure had to PAY Compugraphic for the license!

>     Peter
>--
>     Peter Cherna, Software Engineer, Commodore-Amiga, Inc.
>     {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!peter    peter@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com
>My opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer.
>"This is a one line proof...if we start sufficiently far to the left."


	-- Ethan

Ethan Solomita: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu

	Tell NewTek that my bread is already toasted and they
better be coming out with a microwave!