Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!valnet!joseph From: joseph@valnet.UUCP (Joseph Hillenburg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: NoiseTracker V2.0 out! Message-ID: <0oPVN2w162w@valnet.UUCP> Date: 14 Aug 90 06:42:20 GMT References: <9008120043.AA03382@jade.berkeley.edu> Organization: Valley BBS Network Lines: 68 S36666WB@ETSUACAD.BITNET (Brian Wright) writes: > On 11 Aug 90 21:16:22 GMT you said: > >In article <9008111912.AA01990@jade.berkeley.edu> S36666WB@ETSUACAD.BITNET > >(Brian Wright) writes: > >> I have a few comments & questions about Noistracker and it's so-called > >>commercial release. First, since Noisetracker was based on Soundtracker > >[...] > >>If this is the case how can a HACKED version of an original release become > >>commercial? First the original author must agree to this. > > >It can't. ALL the 'hacked' copies are an infringment of the rights of the > >original author. > > It can't what? Be released as a commercial product? If NT 2.0 is a BETA > of a commercial release then who is releasing it? Is the original author of > The Ultimate Soundtracker releasing it? If not then it can't be released > as commercial anything to anybody according to what you have just said. > That's to bad too. From what I have seen of Soundtracker and NoiseTracker > they would make excellent products. > > I don't condone what the hackers did but the results of their efforts (no > matter how immoral) are here. It would be nice to see the original author of > The Ultimate Soundtracker allow these programs at least the right to survive > in PD form (or even shareware with donations given to the original author). > > >Whatever these 'authors' did was illegal, and as far as rights they have > >NOTHING. Modifying original code does NOT give ANY rights to the one > >making the modifications. This is known as "modification of pre-existing > >material", and all rights on the modifications are maintained by the > >original author. In fact, all these thieves (I like that better than pirate > >because that IS what they are) are fully liable for copyright infringement. > > > >-- Marco > >-- > >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >"Xerox sues somebody for copying?" -- David Letterman > >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > As you have pointed out the Hacker/Code Modifiers (Thieves as you call them) > would then not get any compensation for the PD or shareware programs. Perhap > even to remove the names of the Hackers off the programs before placing them > into PD or shareware. Perhaps we should support MED 2.0 instead. That > piece of software has NO controversy associated with it and has the source co > included. It's also on a Fred Fish disk. It supports MIDI as well. > > By the way, will there be ANY Soundtracker/MED type programs that WILL work o > the 3000? Commercial, PD or Shareware? Thanks in advance.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ======================================================================= > ||To steal from one is plagiarism. To steal from many is research. || > ||___________________________________ ---UNKNOWN--- || > || | / / || > ||---Brian Wright | / / || > ||---s36666wb@etsuacad.etsu.edu | \ \/ / Only Amiga || > ||---Commercial Artist and Amigaphile| \/\/ Makes It Possible!! || > ======================================================================= I agree...We should start useing MED. After all, MED is better yhan SoundTracker AND NoiseTracker, and it is ALMOST 100% compatible. Plus, it has MIDI and can read SoundFX files. (It might read SMUS, but I havent tried it yet... -Joseph Hillenburg InterNet: joseph@valnet UUCP: iuvax!valnet!joseph PC-Link: Joe Hillenburg Most other systems: Joseph Hillenburg Don't buy a computer unless it's an Amiga - Me - AMIGA RULES! - AMIGA RUL