Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!bacchus.pa.dec.com!granite.pa.dec.com!mwm From: mwm@raven.pa.dec.com (Mike (Real Amigas have keyboard garages) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: autodoc reader Message-ID: Date: 14 Aug 90 18:41:03 GMT References: <6265@milton.u.washington.edu> <13794@cbmvax.commodore.com> Sender: news@wrl.dec.com (News) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 48 In-Reply-To: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com's message of 14 Aug 90 14:45:00 GMT In article <13794@cbmvax.commodore.com> peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) writes: Path: bacchus.pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!peter From: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Date: 14 Aug 90 14:45:00 GMT References: <6265@milton.u.washington.edu> Reply-To: peter@cbmvax (Peter Cherna) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 27 In article <6265@milton.u.washington.edu> dlarson@blake.u.washington.edu (Dale Larson) writes: > > >Does anyone know where I can get a good autodoc reader? >(better than "more" or "less" :-) Fish disk 297 includes the DevKit, which is a collection of ARexx macros and C-programs for integrating CygnusEd into the autodocs and includes, etc. There is a stand-alone program called GetAutoDoc that is part of it. I've got (had? - depends on many other things) a version of the 2.0 AutoDocs loaded into the hypertext system "Thinker". When CBM gets more 3000's so they can ship me one, I'm going to try it with the read-only demo version. The results look more like the infominder version than getautodoc, but it's got one advantage over both: given an autodoc that references another function, you can click on the names of functions, and get the docs for the referenced function. Your choice of doing it in the current window, another window, or any open thinker window. Unfortunately, building those thinker documents was a lot of work, and it's not liable to be repeated. Nor am I sure about how I can distribute them - after all, they're covered by some funny agreement I had to sign to get them. It'd help a lot of the autodocs had a consistent format, instead of whatever whoever wrote them thought would work best. Then again, that would probably help _everybody_ who wanted to load the autodocs into some form of "intelligent reader".