Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!dali.cs.montana.edu!milton!blake.acs.washington.edu!scalawag
From: scalawag@blake.acs.washington.edu (Keith Frederick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: Design Master vs Genesys
Summary: GeneSys is better.
Message-ID: <6375@milton.u.washington.edu>
Date: 15 Aug 90 22:19:02 GMT
References: <3943@crash.cts.com>
Sender: news@milton.u.washington.edu
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 31

In article <3943@crash.cts.com> diz@pro-gsplus.cts.com (Steven Disbrow) writes:
>In-Reply-To: message from bkahn@archive.rtp.dg.com
>
>thought out and it is very professional looking.  The only thing that Design
>Master can do that Genesys can't is make Dialog Boxes and Lists.  Not that big
>a deal (although my latest project requires both, so Genesys won't be much
>help there :)
>
>
> Diz
> -My-
> Name:    Steven W. Disbrow - Publisher of GS+ Magazine    | Send Me Your  
> Address: POB 15366, Chattanooga, TN 37415 (U.S.A.)________| Address & I'll
> Voice:   (615) 870-4960 |ProLine: diz@pro-gsplus |<-other | Send You A Sample
> BBS:     (615) 875-4607 |America Online: Obnoxio |<-stuff | Of GS+ Magazine!

Well, why not simply use a Window instead of a dialog box, Windows are a lot
more flexible to use and set up in my opinion.  Also, GeneSys I believe can
use Alerts.

I thought GeneSys could use Lists (are you sure it can't?).  One thing that
I really like about GeneSys is its ease of use and ease of editing.  Design-
Master is actually quite frustrating to use and IMHO the interface stinks.

I agree with you, GET GENESYS.
 
The only plus DesignMaster has is its ability to work in 320x200 mode and
the amount of sample source code that comes with it.
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith R. Frederick / scalawag@blake.acs.washington.edu / CIS:73760,3521