Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!umbc3!...!uunet!umbc5!cityzoo.acs.umbc.edu!greg
From: greg@cityzoo.acs.umbc.edu (Greg Sylvain,Lib 007a,3929,6445148)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Why only one partition/disk in a 300 cluster ????
Message-ID: <3760@umbc3.UMBC.EDU>
Date: 16 Aug 90 15:56:20 GMT
Sender: newspost@umbc3.UMBC.EDU
Reply-To: greg@umbc3.umbc.edu (Greg Sylvain,Lib 007a,3929,6445148)
Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Lines: 18


	Hello again,

	I'm curious,could someone explain to me the reasoning behind 
restricting the 300 machines to having only 1 partition per disk.  The same 
disk's can be used between machines (300&800), I believe. And supposedly both 
300's and 800's are running the same verion of the os, so theoretically, the
functionality should be identical (?) between architectures. 

	Just curious, Thanks,
	greg
				Greg Sylvain
				Academic Computing Services
				Systems Programmer
			
	UUCP:           	...!{uunet}!umbc5!greg
	Internet (Arpa) :	greg@umbc5.umbc.edu
 	BITNET :		GREGS@UMBC