Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ntvaxb!mouse
From: mouse@vaxb.acs.unt.edu (Dhanapong Saengrussamee-University of North Texas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: After Dark Upgrade...
Message-ID: <32002.26c6e0e3@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>
Date: 13 Aug 90 17:18:27 GMT
References: <1835@mountn.dec.com>
Lines: 29

In article <1835@mountn.dec.com>,
craparotta@craparotta.enet.dec.com (Joe Craparotta) writes:
> From seeing After Dark 2.0, all I can say is that I'm impressed with
> the work that was put into it...  What really bothers me is that being a
> REAL registered user, that I wasn't aware of this or still haven't gotten
> an upgrade letter in the mail... Come on!! Support the people that bought!!
> 
> Joe Craparotta	Craparotta@level.dec.com
-- 

  I called them last week and the girl who answer the phone said that the
registered user will get the upgrade letter sometime in the mid August.  And
no, I did not receive my letter yet, either.
  Back to the subject of support.  I know there's thread going on last week
about the price of upgrading to 2.0.  I am satisfied, and willing to pay 
$14.95 to upgrade my After Dark.
  But why, WHY, do I, as a registered user of After Dark, have to pay the
same price as Pyro's user who wants to switch to After Dark?  Should
registered users have a higher rank than the users of the competitor product?

__Mouse.o()~
--------------- Project Bluebonnet & Texas Center for Educational Technology -
Dhanapong "Mouse" Saengrussamee    | AppleLink : U1364 | BITNET : mouse@untvax
Technical Support, CECS Dept.,     | BIX : d.mouse.s | CompuServe : 71301,1516
University of North Texas,         | GENie : d.saengrussa | IP : 129.120.1.4
PO Box 5155, Denton, TX 76203-5155 | Internet : mouse@vaxb.acs.unt.edu
voice (817) 565-4435               | SPAN : utspan::utandx::untvax::mouse
fax   (817) 565-4425               | THENet : untvax::mouse
------------------- UUCP : {...!uunet!convex!iex}!ntvax!vaxb.acs.unt.edu!mouse