Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!midway!news
From: gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: MPW C++ vs. THINK C 4.0 :THE SUMMARY
Message-ID: <1990Aug16.194103.23504@midway.uchicago.edu>
Date: 16 Aug 90 20:36:26 GMT
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (News Administrator)
Organization: University of Chicago Graduate School of Business
Lines: 19

------- 
In article <1990Aug16.193325.23172@midway.uchicago.edu>, I summarized a lot of
opinions about MPW C++ vs. THINK C 4.0

One thing I think I should mention about the opinions in my summary, since I
left off attributions: none of the statements I summarized is an official
statement from Apple or Symantec (although some people from Apple helped me
out), and I have no way of verifying their accuracy.  

Just thought I'd add that (probably pointless) disclaimer, just in case someone
were to read too much into what I posted.  Again, thanks to all who helped.

Robert

============================================================================
= gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu * generic disclaimer: * "It's more fun to =
=            		         * all my opinions are *  compute"         =
=                                * mine                *  -Kraftwerk       =
============================================================================