Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!peregrine!sceard!ncr-sd!se-sd!lord
From: lord@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Dave Lord)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ncr
Subject: Re: Terminfo and termcap definition for vt102
Message-ID: <3707@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Date: 17 Aug 90 17:41:32 GMT
References: <1374@rd1632.Dayton.NCR.COM> <1990Aug16.174800.18524@pilikia.pegasus.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: NCR Corporation, Systems Engineering - San Diego
Lines: 16

In article <1990Aug16.174800.18524@pilikia.pegasus.com> art@pilikia.pegasus.com (Art Neilson) writes:
<In article <1374@rd1632.Dayton.NCR.COM> hann@rd1632.Dayton.NCR.com (Ed Hann) writes:
<<Does anybody have a vt102 terminfo and termcap definition for the Tower.
<<We use Procomm Plus and Procomm Plus the network version, which dropped
<<there vt100 emulation.  I'm not sure how different they are.  Thanks.
<
<Have you tried selecting vt102 emulation in Procomm Plus and using the
<vt100 terminfo/termcap entries on the Tower ?  Seems to work OK for us,
<though we haven't thoroughly tested the emulation.  Clearing the screen,
<cursor addressing and arrow keys work fine.

In fact I think you'll find that the vt100 terminfo entry on the Tower
matches Procomm Plus's vt102 emulation much better than it matched
Procomm's vt100 emulation. Confusing but true.

- Dave.Lord@SanDiego.NCR.COM