Xref: utzoo comp.sys.sun:11374 comp.periphs.scsi:932
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!rice!rice!sun-spots-request
From: ingr!b11!gibson@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: SCSI drives with read-ahead caching
Keywords: Hardware
Message-ID: <1990Aug15.235603.7423@rice.edu>
Date: 14 Aug 90 01:25:31 GMT
Sender: sun-spots-request@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 19
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Originator: spots@titan.rice.edu
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 307, message 2
X-Refs:  Original: v9n302

In article <1990Aug13.011415.6197@rice.edu> you write:

>I have an SS1 with a Fujitsu M2263S-512 (655Mb) drive attached; the drive
>supports read-ahead caching, which I have enabled. What I would like to
>know is whether it is worth adjusting file systems on the drive with
>tunefs to take advantage of this cache?
>
>Has anybody any experience with caching drives and tuning? 

It has been our experience that you can get excellent (sequential) read
performance by turning on read-ahead and setting rotational delay (via
tunfs) to 0ms. Sadly, the write performance goes way down. I believe that
with a new driver, called by some a "low level scatterer-gatherer" the
write performance would return to normal.

With SCSI II drives becoming available now the read-ahead parameters are
getting very confusing. - number and/or size of segments - read/write
retention priority - max/min prefetch - cross cylinder boundary enable -
etc