Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!rice!rice!sun-spots-request
From: rgreene@ricecsvm.rice.edu (Bob Greene)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Sunspots Forsale Vote
Keywords: Miscellaneous
Message-ID: <1990Aug15.235945.7928@rice.edu>
Date: 15 Aug 90 23:10:00 GMT
Sender: sun-spots-request@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 17
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Originator: spots@titan.rice.edu
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 308, message 4

Well, the revote is in, and here's how it went (again, SHALLOW response):

NO  jms@tardis.tymnet.com
YES advsys!roger@relay.eu.net
YES ittc!ptb@ukc.ac.uk
NO  reddy@blackbird.afit.af.mil
NO  inmet!keenan@uunet.uu.net
NO  lwv27@cas.bitnet
NO  dupuy@hudson.cs.columbia.edu
YES foster@orion.oac.uci.edu
YES anselmo-ed@cs.yale.edu
YES advsys!raham@relay.eu.net
NO  slym@cs.uh.edu

So, in a close battle [:)] the motion is defeated in it's second
vote by a vote of 6-5. Even with the big exposure the second vote
got, it generated nowhere near the traffic that the first one did.