Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw
From: USERQBPP@SFU.BITNET (Robert Slade)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Review of F-PROT (PC)
Message-ID: <0011.9008131823.AA10141@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 12 Aug 90 04:20:54 GMT
Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Lines: 5
Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu

I have used all of SCAN, the IBM VIRSCAN and F-PROT.  I have found all
of them equally easy to use, and equally effective in detecting viri.

However, F-PROT is, in addition to less expensive, more complete in
the suite of tools it provides, and easier to add "signatures" to.