Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!mstr!nmiller From: nmiller@mstr.hgc.edu (norman miller) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Another county heard from Message-ID: <545@mstr.hgc.edu> Date: 13 Aug 90 14:12:30 GMT Sender: news@mstr.hgc.edu Reply-To: nmiller@mstr.hgc.edu (norman miller) Distribution: usa Organization: The Hartford Graduate Center, Hartford CT. Lines: 67 Imagine this: a firm announces a revolutionary product, say a new coffee-maker. The announcement is followed by reams of free publicity in leading newspapers. The hottest thing since the invention of halvah, it's said. The usual contingent of techni- cal-novelty addicts, myself among them, rush to buy and test. Mild disappointment: it appears to be a sluggish drip pot, nothing more. This time they read the directions carefully and try again. Same thing: sluggish drip pot. They've been had. What do the buyers do? If the turnip in question is a coffee pot, they cry foul and call the cops. If it's a computer program sold by the world's largest and richest software firm, they tend to blame themselves for not having learned to use the software properly. But in fact, dear friends, Windows 3.0 is simply a very slow drip pot. Watch this: "Standard mode is the normal operating mode for running Windows. This mode provides access to expanded memory and also lets you switch among non-Windows applications" (User's Guide, p. 10). What are non-Windows applications? Why, nothing much: just Word Perfect, Lotus 123, Quattro, Procomm, etc. In short, if you happen to own some of the most popular (and expen- sive) software on the market, Microsoft will now enable you to *switch* from one to the other, something that Software Carousel has enabled one to do for at least 4 years. And, where Carousel is elegant and speedy, Windows--even with a mouse--is cumbersome and unbelievably slow. So slow,in fact, that Windows 3.0 is almost worth buying as a specimen of comically inept programming. Multi-tasking? Only if you own a 386 machine. Desqview enables even lowly 286 owners to run several programs at once (and swiftly at that)? So what? Desqview hasn't got quill-pen and card-file icons (or the darling hour-glass that asks you to wait for a routine which--were it one of many old public domain routines--would long ago have been up and running). Desqview doesn't require that you wait as much as ten seconds--along with hard-disk noises suggestive of a Mexican school bus climbing a mountain--in order to read the help screen? Again, so what? Windows will put a real working clock on your screen! Wow. Now if Microsoft had meant to play fair with its customers, it would have warned potential users that a 386 was virtually a necessity. It would not have given the name of "standard mode" to a manifestly sub-standard product. But that would severely have limited the demand. God forbid. Windows 3.0 may indeed be great on a 386. I note that a whole slew of manufacturers are now shipping it with their machines, which suggests that it may be a winner. What's unforgiveable is the arrogant misrepresenta- tion to the huge number of non-386 owners that Windows is for them. Do I seem bitter? I really meant to tell of my bafflement. For in fact, I have been alternately so enraged and yet so sure it's my fault that I've installed and erased Windows four times in 2 weeks. (That takes patience, by the way: Microsoft ships Windows on microthin cheapos that may or may not be recognized by one's disk drive. And the first batch of Windows contained a floppy which was not only empty, but hadn't even been formatted.) So, while I'm pretty certain by now that I've given Windows a fair test, I hope that some of you out there will either confirm that I'm right or point out some silly dumb-head thing I did wrong. Surely it isn't just the slowest drip pot ever made. Or is it? Thus doth hype make ditherers of us all. Norman Miller