Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!usc!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!news!laughner
From: laughner@news.nd.edu (Tom laughner)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: QEMM386/Windows config question
Message-ID: <351@news.nd.edu>
Date: 14 Aug 90 13:30:40 GMT
References: <1990Aug14.015042.15881@amd.com>
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
Lines: 20

From article <1990Aug14.015042.15881@amd.com>, by phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai):
> In article <343@news.nd.edu> laughner@news.nd.edu (Tom laughner) writes:
> |You do not need additional memory management for 386 enhanced.  That's
> 
> Do you use any networks?
> 
Our next stage of testing is on networks.  We run Vines and Netware
here.  So far we haven't had any problems with Netware 2.15C running
applications like WordPerfect, dBase, or Lotus.  We have some
applications that are very memory intensive that we haven't tested yet.
We haven't done any testing on Banyan, yet.  Vines is so much more
memory intensive, that if we don't have any problems on Vines, we're
set.  According to Microsoft, though, we shouldn't have any problems
(notice we're testing their claims, first, BEFORE we implement...).

Tom Laughner
DOS Consultant/Analyst
University of Notre Dame
(219) 239-8270
TLAUGHNE@IRISHMVA