Xref: utzoo rec.birds:2593 news.groups:22960
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!mephisto!prism!sun13!sandee
From: sandee@sun13.scri.fsu.edu (Daan Sandee)
Newsgroups: rec.birds,news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: REC.PETS, REC.BIRDS division.
Message-ID: <383@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>
Date: 13 Aug 90 13:12:09 GMT
References: <1282@cnps.PHILIPS.nl> <1965@lectroid.sw.stratus.com> <3219@wrgate.WR.TEK.COM> <1990Aug10.193512.6545@granite.cr.bull.com> <1010.26c5a329@desire.wright.edu>
Followup-To: rec.birds
Organization: SCRI, Florida State University
Lines: 16

In article <1010.26c5a329@desire.wright.edu> sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
>In article <1990Aug10.193512.6545@granite.cr.bull.com>, horvath@granite.cr.bull.com (John Horvath) writes:
>> 
>> in the latter, I find the former not just uninteresting, but offensive.
>
>I dont mean to start a flame, but what is so offensive about pet birds?  I

If you don't want to start a flame, then don't make remarks like that. Or,
don't respond to the other guy's remarks.
This demonstrates EXACTLY why this group should be split. I can tolerate the
drivel about budgies being off their feed, but I don't want all the flame wars
between groups of opposing interest. 

Daan Sandee                                           sandee@sun16.scri.fsu.edu
Supercomputer Computations Research Institute
Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4052  (904) 644-7045