Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!agate!tornado.Berkeley.EDU!boris
From: boris@tornado.Berkeley.EDU (Boris Chen)
Newsgroups: rec.birds
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: REC.PETS, REC.BIRDS division.
Message-ID: <1990Aug17.115823.865@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 17 Aug 90 11:58:23 GMT
References: <1918@lectroid.sw.stratus.com> <32320004@hprmokg.HP.COM> <90228.201718JAHAYES@MIAMIU.BITNET>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: boris@tornado.Berkeley.EDU (Boris Chen)
Organization: ucb
Lines: 16

Frankly, this group does not have a great amount of traffic, and I don't
think that any split is necessary.
Look at some other groups, such as, rec.arts.startrek or rec.bicycles, or
someothers, they have more than 10 times the amount of messages and I
don't hear them spliting up into, rec.arts.theoldstartrek, 
rec.arts.thenextgeneration, rec.bicycles.roadbike, rec.bicycles.mountainbike,
you get the idea.

It isn't that hard to hit 'n' or 'k.'


That's my two cents.

/----------------------------------------------------------\
| Boris Chen    || Berkeley, CA  || boris@ocf.berkeley.edu |
\----------------------------------------------------------/