Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!samsung!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!bacchus.pa.dec.com!decvax.dec.com!decvax!evans From: evans@decvaxdec.com (Marc Evans Ultrix Q/A) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Fooling Radar Detectors Message-ID: <1990Aug17.151824@decvaxdec.com> Date: 17 Aug 90 19:18:24 GMT References: <1990Aug15.112532.17516@ariel.unm.edu> <6154@tekred.CNA.TEK.COM> Sender: news@decvax.dec.com.UUCP Reply-To: evans@decvax.DEC.COM Organization: Synergytics Lines: 26 In article <6154@tekred.CNA.TEK.COM>, vekurpan@tekred.CNA.TEK.COM (Vincent E Kurpan) writes: |> When I worked at Sanders in a radar countermeasures group I asked |> one of our Phd guru types about passive measures like a simple fan |> in front of the radiator. He said it probably would work quite well |> BUT even passive countermeasures would be construed as obstruction |> of justice. [...] Does this imply that my Saab 99 Turbo which has dual fans on the front of the radiator for cooling purposes could be 1) lowering my radar footprint, 2) considered an obstruction of justice? My personal opinion is that 1 is maybe, and 2 is no, but I thought I would check your opinion(s)... - Marc ======================================================================== ==== Marc Evans - WB1GRH - evans@decvax.DEC.COM | Synergytics (603)635-8876 Unix and X Software Contractor | 21 Hinds Ln, Pelham, NH 03076 ======================================================================== ====