Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.d
Subject: Re: wp2latex (1 of 4)
Message-ID: <15767@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Date: 20 Aug 90 05:15:30 GMT
References: <6387@sugar.hackercorp.com> <19623@well.sf.ca.us>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Lines: 19

It can be hard to find net participants who care enough to keep track of
what's going on without having any potentially controversial opinions.
I think it's better to err on the side of more information rather than
to try and impose litmus tests on a potential information provider.  If
someone wants to start an FAQ here, let 'em.  If the contents are an
egregious mishmash, the membership will make its feelings known quickly
enough.

Ideally the contents of an FAQ posting are jointly arrived at and
cooperatively updated to reflect current knowledge.  No one person's
opinions, including the administrator's, should predominate.  If the
administrator has a particular hobbyhorse (like Archive-Header) he wants
included in the FAQ, fine, but if significant member disagreement exists
on the point, that should be mentioned too.

-- 
Technology is a way of organizing       '   '     Tom Neff
the universe so that man doesn't have    '   '    tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM
to experience it. -- Max Frisch           '   '   uunet!bfmny0!tneff