Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: alt.sources.d Subject: Re: Archive-name Message-ID: <6426@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 23 Aug 90 00:12:57 GMT References: <9008211455.AA02499@talos.pm.com> <193@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US> <15776@bfmny0.BFM.COM> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 13 In article <15776@bfmny0.BFM.COM> tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes: > I'm afraid that trying to enforce a header field like Archive-Name: in > an unmoderated source group like alt.sources goes against the grain of > the group. You are always going to have people who don't supply it; we > are always going to have these arguments. And yes, those who do supply > it will sometimes do it wrong, or redundantly, or ambiguously. This is also true of trying to enforce *sources* in alt.sources, or for that matter trying to enforce *anything* on Usenet. All I want is for a reasonable percentage of folks to know about and use it... -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .