Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uc!cs.umn.edu!cybrspc!roy From: cybrspc!roy@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) Newsgroups: alt.sources.d Subject: Re: Stevie (vi clone) Keywords: stevie Message-ID: Date: 24 Aug 90 16:12:41 GMT References: <55195@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Organization: Villa CyberSpace, Minneapolis, MN Lines: 18 bobmon@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (RAMontante) writes: > FWIW, v3.69 has many functional improvements over v3.68. For MSDOS users, > it also supports BIOS video, which is less pelasing (to me) but faster. (ahem. I've moved this to alt.sources.d to give the source postings more breathing room :-) I've played about pretty extensively with Stevie 3.69 whilst modifying it for BBS use (under MS-DOS). I have compiled both with and without BIOS video writes. The non-BIOS routines are _significantly_ faster on my machine. The only difference I can see is that BIOS video doesn't require the NANSI driver. Perhaps I just have a lethargic BIOS? -- Roy M. Silvernail | #include | Does virtual now available at: | main(){ | reality need cybrspc!roy@cs.umn.edu | float x=1; | swap space? (cyberspace... be here!)| printf("Just my $%.2f.\n",x/50);} | -- me