Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.modems:6558 comp.unix.xenix:12872 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!nshore!steve From: steve@nshore.uucp (Stephen Walick) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Telebit T1000 problems Message-ID: <1990Aug22.002035.3712@nshore.uucp> Date: 22 Aug 90 00:20:35 GMT References: <105@mnopltd.UUCP> Reply-To: uunet!ncoast!nshore!steve (Stephen Walick) Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems Organization: Nshore Hacking and Salvage Lines: 53 As quoted from <105@mnopltd.UUCP> by neal@mnopltd.UUCP: +--------------- | ->As quoted from <102@mnopltd.UUCP> by neal@mnopltd.UUCP: | -> | ->+--------------- | ->| ->I am having a problem getting a T1000 Telebit to connect properly with | ->| ->a Trailblazer Plus over standard telephone lines. | ->| -> ....dialTBIT has never worked, and the TB+ is | ->| ->run from Dialers and nvram: | ->| | ->| I just know I going to get stomped on for this but, why haven't you used | ->| the dialTBIT? Did it need to get compiled? | ->+--------------- | -> | ->SCO's dialTBIT script is for the "Trailblazer" and uses S registers that | ->are not known to the T1000, viz., the "S111= " register (about file com- | ->pression) does not appear on the T1000. I had to comment those references | ->in the setup and in the script itself or I would run into "mucho" problems. | | Thanks for the warning, but I just looked at the manual for the T1000 and it | does show S111... perhaps you mean s110? I do notice that it is not in the | manual although the rev 1.3 dialTBIT.c does try to set it. I also notice | that it appears to be unsettable in the T1000, eg: | ats110=4 | OK | ats110? | 000 +--------------- Whoops -- you're very correct. Sorry for the mis-information to any and all readers of these news groups who may have been misled. Indeed, the "S111" register is "File Tranfer Protocol Support" and I had intended to refer to the "S110" register. However, since my last follow-up, I have had personal contact with other T1000 users who happen to have an "older" model whose S-registers were *NOT* the same as my own, and that fact demonstrated by both the Model number on the label and the corresponding manual. Hence, *CAUTION* should be taken, even when speaking about T1000 TBIT modems. The same T1000 may be identified by a different "Product Identification String", which can be found in the "S49" register. This can be determined by an "ATI0" . On my own T1000, the "ATI0" returns "968" or a "Model T1SA" and the manual accompanying it is "90062-02 Rev. E". It definitely does *NOT* have register "S110" which is "Trailblazer" spe- cific referring to it's "Compression Mode". Again, apologies for mis-information, and regards.... Steve Walick -- Stephen J. Walick, Asst Sysop of the < XBBS > program at NCoast.ORG uunet!ncoast!nshore!steve nshore!steve@ncoast.org