Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: Randal Schwartz <merlyn@iwarp.intel.com>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Make Sprint Put it in Writing!
Message-ID: <11347@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 25 Aug 90 22:04:43 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: Randal Schwartz <merlyn@iwarp.intel.com>
Organization: Stonehenge; netaccess via Intel, Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Lines: 24
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 596, Message 4 of 8


In article <11330@accuvax.nwu.edu>, cambler@polyslo (Fubar) writes:

| Seven minutes later, he was back, telling me that I would have to be
| called back, as the supervisor hadn't responded to him yet. I gave him
| my phone number. The home one. The one with the AT&T long distance
| service.  Well, to be fair, ALL my numbers have AT&T. They never put
| me on hold.

Based on recent experiences of others here, I'd be calling
1-700-555-4141 every few days to make sure that my 1+ dialing didn't
get switched over in the process.

After all, you *did* call *them*.  Maybe they consider that a request
for a switch.  :-)

Just another phone user (with AT&T as my default and only carrier...
we don't have 10xxx here),


Randal L. Schwartz, Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095 
on contract to Intel's iWarp project, Beaverton, Oregon, USA, Sol III
merlyn@iwarp.intel.com ...!any-MX-mailer-like-uunet!iwarp.intel.com!merlyn