Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!alberta!access!edm!geoff
From: geoff@edm.uucp (Geoff Coleman)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: GNU emacs RS6000
Message-ID: <1990Aug20.053814.2978@edm.uucp>
Date: 20 Aug 90 05:38:14 GMT
References: <1990Aug18.032057.22131@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
Organization: Unexsys Systems inc.
Lines: 19

From article <1990Aug18.032057.22131@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, by grund@pyrite.som.cwru.edu (Victor Grund):
> In article <NELSON.90Aug16224848@image.clarkson.edu>, nelson@sun (Russ Nelson) writes:
>>   I have just recently received an IBM RS6000 and am feeling a bit lost 
>>   without emacs.
>>
> 
> IBM's reason for dropping Gnu EMACS *was* economic, through threat of
> legal action.
> 

	Yes but what about those of us that received it with the 9005
load of the OS. What if anything did IBM change in there version other than 
s- and m- files. I do know that the 9005 version compiles under the golden
code just fine. Is it all right for us to have this code? Is it all right for
us to redistribute this code?


Geoff Coleman
Unexsys Systems