Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Metacompilation
Message-ID: <1574.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 23 Aug 90 03:05:49 GMT
Organization: String, Scotch tape, and Paperclips.  (in Pgh, PA)
Lines: 29


 Date: 08-20-90 (19:02)              Number: 754 (Echo)
   To: RAY DUNCAN                    Refer#: NONE
 From: LARRY GABRIEL                   Read: 08-20-90 (23:35)
 Subj: COMMENT                       Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

[Sorry about the corruption in this.  It seems to have occurred before
 I got to it.  -dwp]

 We are interested in your RTX2000 metacompiler.  Do you support or plan
 to support the RTX2001?  In some of our proposed applications, math
 speed is not important, low cost is.  ( We are just doing some very
 simple logic functions, IF THEN, etc. )
 According to your manual on the Metacompiler which we bought from 
 you a while back, the RTX version of the metacompiler differs in
 that the PC is used as a disk server and terminal. Is this function
 similar to the Indelko or Innob!m%Y%yqJ5RR&=s{#V7F7wSAa* D-12016e to write
code on an active RTX on one of our
 own boards, and I understand that the Harris Blue Box is not capable
 of such a function.
 I also have heard that you folks wrote some of the code which Harris
 offers with or for the Blue Box.  How does your metacompiler differ?
 Thank you very much for your time.  I will look later here, or if
 you would like, our # is 818-458-2742.  Thanks....Larry Gabriel

 NET/Mail : LMI Forth Board, Los Angeles, CA (213) 306-3530             
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: uunet!willett!dwp or dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us