Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!shelby!neon!minnie.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@minnie.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: PostScript vs TrueType?
Message-ID: <1990Aug27.175229.19524@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 27 Aug 90 17:52:29 GMT
References: <1798@abvax.UUCP> <9724@goofy.Apple.COM> <438@three.mv.com> <2120@ux.acs.umn.edu> <1791@abvax.UUCP> <1990Aug24.213407.26653@ico.isc.com>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 11

In article <1798@abvax.UUCP>, jaz@icd.ab.com (Jack A. Zucker) writes:
> You're right. The Postscript clones have obviously driven the price 
> down. But, I still have to shell out additional money to get the
> screen fonts !

I don't know what kind of computer you use, but I've never had to pay for
screen fonts. Additional PostScript fonts, yes, but not bitmapped versions
of fonts supplied with the printer.

Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu